Subject: Re: Marske Monarch
From: Shark
Date: Thu Mar 29 00:51:02 2001
Naah, you're not that nieve. (Either that, or we're both hopelessly dense.)
<g>
I thought the same thing when I first saw it, WOW, only 14 pounds? But
after checking out Steve's webpage, it said the older Monarch was 240lbs and
it has since been shed a hundred of that.
Doh!
Still, 140lb is great for a wing with that much glide. It looks great.
Not like I'll ever fly one tho, unless someone has a free hangar they're
not using.
Shark
"Stroller" wrote...
> skyshark@att.SPAMDEFENSE.net top-posted...
> > That was a typo.. the - key is right next to the 0 key.
> >
> >
> > "Steve Bralla" <zulufive@aol.com> wrote in message
> > news:20010328211625.25414.00000459@nso-cd.aol.com...
> > > In article <3AC1E98B.A8E71504@gte.net>, Matthew Redsell
> > > <marske@gte.net>
> > > writes:
> > >
> > > >This year we have developed the carbon Monarch now
> > > >weighing under 14- lbs.
> > >
> > > WOW! That is light!
>
> D'oh..! I'm so naive..!
>
> Stroller.
>
> --
> Stroller stroller at bigfoot dot com
>
> Whenever you are asked if you can do a job, tell 'em, Certainly I can!
> Then get busy and find out how to do it. (Roosevelt)
View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: Re: Marske Monarch, Paul Hurless
Next message: Re: Paragliding in Russia (Ufa), Sergey Kataev
Previous message in thread: Re: Marske Monarch, Paul Hurless
| |
|