Subject: Re: Hangpoints - April Skywings (UK)
From: Rod Buck
Date: Wed Apr 17 00:40:03 2002
In article <dN0v8.29663$Rw2.2224769@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,
Mark Jones <heliosstudios@att.net.SpamDefense!> writes
>"Rod Buck" <rodbuck@telespeed.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
>news:8EZ0KDAnFCv8Ew3f@telespeed.demon.co.uk...
>> I've said it before - the public think that PG are "safer" because
>> they're parachutes - and parachutes save your life, don't they?
>>
>> Also, HG are still carrying the "death-seeking crazies" label from the
>> early 80's/late 70's.
>>
>> But, we in DSC are gonna do something about it - we're helping some PG
>> pilots see the light....successfully.
>> - Rod Buck
>
> Curious, what is the expression on the studen't face like when they
>realize their glide ratio has nearly doubled? : )
>
>
-and that they're actually going somewhere?
- incredible!
They tend to be apprehensive about landing, but then I point out that
launching an HG is ten times easier than a PG - you just pick it up and
walk off the hill (well, in my sorta winds, you do!)
None of that faffing about building walls, sorting out lines, reversing
controls, launching with your BACK TO THE SKY, etc...
Swings and roundabouts.
- Rod Buck
View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: Re: Hangpoints - April Skywings (UK), Robert W. Cunningham
Next message: Re: Hangpoints - April Skywings (UK), Rod Buck
Next message in thread: Re: Hangpoints - April Skywings (UK), Rod Buck
Previous message in thread: Re: Hangpoints - April Skywings (UK), Robert W. Cunningham
| |
|