|
|
[index]
[month]
[prev]
[next]
[thead-prev]
[thread-next]
Subject: Re: Contradictory FAR 91 Reg ?
From: Steven P. McNicoll
Date: Tue Jun 05 04:06:28 2001
| |
|
"Paul Baechler" <pbaechle@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:pbaechle-0406012309000001@host-216-76-232-19.hsv.bellsouth.net...
>
> Please state the regulation that defines VFR conditions in Class A
> airspace, as defining VFR conditions is a necessary prerequisite for FAR
> 91.185(b) to be applicable.
>
Defining VFR conditions in Class A airspace is not a necessary prerequisite
for FAR
91.185(b) to be applicable there.
View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: Re: IFR Refresher vs IFR mags, Bob Gardner
Next message: Re: VFR to IFR actual, Roy Smith, CFI
Next message in thread: Re: Contradictory FAR 91 Reg ?, Newps
Previous message in thread: Re: Contradictory FAR 91 Reg ?, Newps
|