|
|
[index]
[month]
[prev]
[next]
[thead-prev]
Subject: Re: SID & DP from same runway - (Lebanon NH) FINAL WORD
From: Flighthawk
Date: Fri Jan 25 02:11:09 2002
| |
|
Definitely not. However, I may be one of the few folks naive enough to
believe that IFR Refresher Magazine would review their articles (and author)
for accuracy before they would publish bogus info. I haven't taken the
opportunity to scrutinize his work yet. I must admit though, there have been
items in IFR Magazine that I didn't quite agree with. I don't remember if
any were authored by him. I never advocate using a single source of info.
PD
AJ <oneatcer@satx.rr.com> wrote in message
news:cJ348.17129$ZK4.632330@typhoon.austin.rr.com...
> Please don't bank on Wally Robert's web site. I confess he's a high time
> pilot, but he has no actual TERPs experience. He bought the book and
became
> an authority with no practical experience. He's shown his tail on this
> newgroup on several occasions. He even went as far as changing his
> call-sign to try and fool people when he was exposed as wrong.
> Flighthawk....are you the new Wally Roberts???
>
> oneatcer
>
> "Flighthawk" <pd49@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:oo248.958$S67.52640@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> > A good web site that might give some insight into DPs would be:
> >
> > www.terps.com/ifrr
> >
> >
> > Flighthawk <pd49@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:A1V38.150$Ab1.7686@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> > >
> > > Ron Rosenfeld <ronrosenfeld@spamcop.net> wrote in message
> > > news:gnlt4uk0il47vak7s4lqhov81bdfbvmthj@4ax.com...
> > > > Well, those of us who claimed that other than 440'/nm CG was
required
> > > > departing rwy 25 via the WR1 departure were wrong.
> > >
> > >
> > > Scary, ain't it.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > So far as Jepp is concerned, the 440'/NM CG required for Runway 25
> > > > departures under visibility of 300-1 is required for ALL departures
> from
> > > > Rwy 25.
> > > >
> > > > Although the TAKE-OFF and OBSTACLE DEPARTURE PROCEDURE seems to be
in
> > the
> > > > same box, in fact the TAKE-OFF PROCEDURE should be considered
separate
> > > from
> > > > the OBSTACLE DEPARTURE PROCEDURE.
> > > >
> > > > So far as the FAA Procedure Specialist is concerned, the (T) on the
> WR1
> > DP
> > > > chart refers one to the same information.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA)
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: Re: Visual separation while IFR?, Newps
Next message: Re: Center Freq., Alex
Previous message in thread: Re: SID & DP from same runway - (Lebanon NH) FINAL WORD, Ron Rosenfeld
|