|
|
[index]
[month]
[prev]
[next]
[thead-prev]
[thread-next]
Subject: Re: Timed approaches, are they really used?
From: Jim Baker
Date: Sat Jan 26 23:52:11 2002
| |
|
Oh......Never mind
"Steven P. McNicoll" <roncachamp@writeme.com> wrote in message
news:u56o4cfbkraka1@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "Jim Baker" <jfbaker@adelphia.net> wrote in message
> news:q6J48.1177$QZ2.436558@news3.news.adelphia.net...
> >
> > If you've ever been cleared for a non-precision approach, then you've
been
> > cleared for a timed approach (in addition to the other means for finding
> the
> > MAP).
> >
>
> I don't believe you're using "timed approach" in the same sense as the
> previous poster.
>
>
View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: Re: Timed approaches, are they really used?, Max T, CFI
Next message: Re: continue direct to...question, BH
Next message in thread: Re: Timed approaches, are they really used?, Bob Gardner
Previous message in thread: Re: Timed approaches, are they really used?, Max T, CFI
|