|
|
[index]
[month]
[prev]
[next]
[thead-prev]
[thread-next]
Subject: Re: So, what's the deal about the third approach?
From: stan
Date: Thu Feb 28 03:56:14 2002
| |
|
Ron, was there any reason to explain why they were so far off? With a
flight director I can't think why. Any suggestion that they were not
receiving glide slope?
Stan
On Wed, 27 Feb 2002 19:14:46 -0500, Ron Natalie <ron@sensor.com>
wrote:
>
>
>Doug wrote:
>>
>> There is no guarantee that a CAT I ILS is even correct below the MAP.
>>
>
>That wasn't the issue. They hit the trees well before where the GS intercepts
>the DH.
>
View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: Re: Charts to purchase..., Casey Webster
Next message: Re: Charts to purchase..., Mike Rapoport
Next message in thread: Re: So, what's the deal about the third approach?, andrew m. boardman
Previous message in thread: Re: So, what's the deal about the third approach?, Ron Natalie
|