[index] [month] [prev] [next] [thead-prev] [thread-next]

"Norm Melick" <henmel@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:3C8CDE6C.3CF8E8A5@worldnet.att.net...
>
> Again, you're not in any position to decide who has knowledge of the
> FARs and ATC procedures and who doesn't.
>

Actually, I am, and you don't.


>
> A current and qualified instrument pilot knows that this is not
> necessarily true. I have already explained this in a previous post. This
> is a prime example why you shouldn't be posting about a subject you know
> nothing about. Leave the operational stuff to us professionals, pussy
> boy.
>

You wrote; "In addition, if your flight requires an alternate, the alternate
must have an SIAP other than a GPS approach." A current and qualified
instrument pilot knows that the filed alternate need not have an SIAP of any
kind if weather reports and/or forecasts indicate the ceiling and visibility
will allow descent from the MIA, approach, and landing at the alternate
under basic VFR conditions, and would not have written that. Your ignorance
has betrayed you again.


>
> No it doesn't stevie.
>

Of course it does. All we're after is the regulation prohibiting use of a
non-certified GPS during IFR enroute flight. A hypothetical flight works
just as well as an actual flight for this purpose and is far cheaper.


>
> For starters, 91.13(a).
>

Oh? How so? In what way is the use of a non-certified GPS during IFR
enroute flight careless or reckless? How would that use endanger the life
or property of another?

View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: Re: Can you File your Route Direct for IFR flight Plan?, Steven P. McNicoll
Next message: Re: Anyone Have Experience with GPS VNAV Approaches?, Richard Kaplan
Next message in thread: Re: Can you File your Route Direct for IFR flight Plan?, Steven P. McNicoll
Previous message in thread: Re: Can you File your Route Direct for IFR flight Plan?, Steven P. McNicoll