[index] [month] [prev] [next] [thead-prev] [thread-next]

On Wed, 15 Nov 2000 23:26:06 -0500, "Rick Cremer"
<rcremer@compuserve.com> wrote:

>>>Under part 91 charts are not required<<
>
>That's not quite right. See 91.503(a)(3)
>
>Best
>
>Rick Cremer
>FAA Aviation Safety Inspector

Help us out, so that 100 people don't have to look it up.

What does 91.503(a)93) say?

And I hope it isn't the old "alll available info" baloney.
>
>
>"MACKLIN" <JMACKLIN@kscable.com> wrote in message
>news:RwGQ5.738$gl4.48093@typhoon.kc.rr.com...
>> Under part 91 charts are not required. Charts are required under 121/135.
>>
>>
>> <dans@icss.com> wrote in message news:8uurhm$pbo$1@nnrp1.deja.com...
>> > What charts are leagally required for a flight? For IFR, I assume one
>> > LEAGALLY needs plates for destination and alternate, as well as CURRENT
>> > enroute charts. Of course it's a good idea to have plates for other
>> > airports along the route as well...
>> >
>> > For VFR, do I leagally have to carry a sectional? Would a WAC do? Do
>> > they need to be current? Can I carry nothing if I am just doing touch
>> > and gos at the home field?
>> >
>> > I searched the FARs for answers to these, and couldn't find them
>> > mentioned anywhere.
>> >
>> > --Dan
>> >
>> >
>> > Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
>> > Before you buy.
>>
>>
>
>

View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: Re: Did you get your IFR rating in a Cessna 152?, Marcelo Pacheco
Next message: Re: Passed IFR check ride, Email address hidden
Next message in thread: Re: Required Charts?, Rick Cremer
Previous message in thread: Re: Required Charts?, Rick Cremer