[index] [month] [prev] [next] [thead-prev] [thread-next]

I was suprised when my 340 had a turn and bank in the panel. I had always
been told by instructors that they were archaic. As you say, maybe that's
just because they look so "old-fashion".

Jerry

"Mike Rapoport" <rapopor1@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:3a18a83e_1@news.greatbasin.net...
> The Turn and Bank indicator is considered better because it only displays
> rate of turn. Turn Coordinators display a combination of turn rate and
roll
> rate, As you point out, it is interesting that many singles have the turn
> coordinator and the twins and turboprops have the turn and bank. The only
> advantage that I know of for the turn coordinator is that it looks better.
>
> Mike
> MU-2
>
> Jerry Kurata wrote in message ...
> >Hi,
> >
> >Does anyone know why a number of planes have turn and slip indicators
> >instead of turn coordinators? I noticed that turn and slips seem to be
> >quite popular in bigger twins vs. turn cordinators in singles.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >jerry
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>

View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: Re: Turn and slip vs. Turn cordinator, Jonathan Friedman
Next message: Re: too much weather information !, Jerry Kurata
Next message in thread: Re: Turn and slip vs. Turn cordinator, Email address hidden
Previous message in thread: Re: Turn and slip vs. Turn cordinator, Jonathan Friedman