[index] [month] [prev] [next] [thead-prev] [thread-next]

If you are inverted, it is reverse sensing.

In article <91eka8$b6k$1@peabody.colorado.edu>,
barr@Colorado.EDU (BARR DOUG) wrote:
> The VOR/DME approach to Aspen, CO (KASE) is marked as TWO VOR's
required.
> Obviously, one must have a localizer, but it doesn't say that.
> But I can make an excellent case for an IFR GPS and one VOR/LOC.
> (The missed is a localizer back course).
>
> The idea is they don't want you fooling with the radios on the missed.
> Not a bad idea. Bottom line is you gotta use common sense.
>
> Extra credit. If you fly the missed localizer back course outbound,
is it
> normal sensing or reverse sensing?
>
> In article <900BC9593sgosnellbigfootcom@204.52.135.10>,
> Stan Gosnell <sgosnell@bigfoot.com> wrote:
> >sprevost2@nospam.home.com (Stan Prevost) wrote in
> ><jHx_5.75926$iy3.17981747@news1.rdc1.tn.home.com>:
> >>In the FARs (Part 91) I can find only two references to when a VOR
> >>receiver is required equipment: for IFR operation in Class B
airspace,
> >>and when operating under IFR using VOR navigation
(under "navigational
> >>equipment appropriate to the ground facilities to be used").
> >>
> >>Are there other cases?
> >>
> >>What's puzzling is IAPs. The approach chart makers frequently put
ADF
> >>REQUIRED or some such on the chart when ADF is required for the
missed
> >>approach or to identify some important fix. But some non-VOR
approaches
> >>have a missed approach holding pattern defined by VORs but are not
> >>marked VOR REQUIRED. VOR receivers seem to be assumed but I don't
know
> >>why from a regulations standpoint.
> >
> >VOR receivers seem to be assumed. See your first paragraph.
However, GPS
> >can be substituted for VOR's (as well as ADF) for the holding
pattern, so
> >it shouldn't be required (nor should the ADF, if a GPS is
installed).
>
>


Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/

View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: Re: Landing in a Blizzard?, Larry Fransson
Next message: Re: VOR DME 7 ORL (Orlando Executive), Ron Rosenfeld
Next message in thread: Re: When is a VOR receiver required?, Don A. Vollum
Previous message in thread: Re: When is a VOR receiver required?, Stan Prevost