[index] [month] [prev] [next] [thead-prev] [thread-next]

You are correct... I screwed up and mis-read the post. I was refering to the
standby vacuum system and not the warning system. Sorry for any confusion
this may have caused N0 more Late night posting for me. I'll go back to
Wild women and . booze!

--
James Hatsis
A&P IA
Please email via Web Site
www.OconeeAirService.com



"William LeFebvre" <wnl@groupsys.com> wrote in message
news:3A5E6BA1.139C66C4@groupsys.com...
> ">>>><<<<" wrote:
> >
> > Read the AD on the Precise Flight system... It's a great unit but the
feds
> > want you to jump through a lot of hoops once it is installed.
>
> Are you referring to the low vacuum indicator or the SVS? I'm not
familiar
> with any burdensome requirements with just the indicator. The AD for the
> standby system only applied to the SVS III. By installing (or upgrading)
to
> the V you don't have to worry about the AD. There are still annual and
> bi-annual bench checks that must be done (as required by the maintenance
> manual), but no flight tests.
>
> --
> William LeFebvre
> Mooney 4074H
> wnl@groupsys.com

View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: NOTAMs, airways, and MEA gaps, Jim Wolper
Next message: Re: NOTAMs, airways, and MEA gaps, Mick Ruthven
Next message in thread: Re: Vac. failure indicator, William LeFebvre
Previous message in thread: Re: Vac. failure indicator, William LeFebvre