|
|
[index]
[month]
[prev]
[next]
[thead-prev]
[thread-next]
Subject: Re: Local approach
From: Steven P. McNicoll
Date: Tue Jan 23 04:30:25 2001
| |
|
"don ferrario" <don@ferrario.com> wrote in message
news:kn6b6.340$Bm6.17607@nnrp1.ptd.net...
>
> If you're on an IFR clearance already, I'd just report "airport
> in sight", and "visual approach requested". The airport's
> reported ceiling and visibility are irrelevant, once you've
> announced that you have the airport in sight. The controllers
> know that the celing and visibility are not the same in
> every quadrant, and will not question your actions (unless
> the airport is in the middle of a snowstorm, or such).
>
That's not correct. The reported weather must be at or above VFR minimums
for a visual approach clearance to be issued.
View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: Re: First Flight (long), Scott Moore
Next message: Re: Would like to know the difference between jeppessen and nos charts?, Jerry Plante
Next message in thread: Re: Local approach, Rich Hare
Previous message in thread: Re: Local approach, Email address hidden
|