|
|
[index]
[month]
[prev]
[next]
[thead-prev]
[thread-next]
Subject: Re: Preventing CFIT
From: John Stephens
Date: Sun Jan 28 06:07:46 2001
| |
|
Get rid of the HTML
On Fri, 26 Jan 2001 21:11:05 GMT, Jed Margolin <news@jmargolin.com> wrote:
> <!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
> <html>
> Marc,
> <p>I have not "stifled" anyone. I have no intention of "stifling" anyone.
> I <i>would</i> like to receive <i>some</i> compensation for the time and
> money I have put into it.
> <p>Marc, do <i>you</i> work for free? And would it be <i>reprehensible</i>
> if you tried to stop someone from stealing your airplane?
> <p>When I started working on the Pilot Aid, around <b><i>1994</i></b> and
> did a search for prior art, I expected to find that someone had already
> done it.
> <p>I was surprised (and appalled) that this was not the case.
> <p>My attempts to bring this technology to the attention of aerospace companies
> have not been very successful.
> <p>> Stifling such innovation" WILL kill people, MANY people,
> and destroy the lives
> <br>> of friends and family.
> <p>Marc, instead of working yourself up into a rage accusing me of stifling
> innovation, killing people and destroying the lives of friends and families
> (you forget "killing babies"), you should ask yourself why the Aerospace
> companies are so resistant to applying technology to make flying safer.
> <p>Is it because they are so busy devouring each other that they have forgotten
> what business they're in?
> <p>Is it because the people who run the Aerospace companies have no respect
> for engineers? The Aerospace companies pay their engineers poorly,
> treat them like crap, and then complain they can't hire enough engineers
> to work on their latest contract.
> <p>What about the several 100K engineers they've laid off in the past 10
> years?
> <p>The Aerospace companies have only lately begun to notice that the drop-off
> in the number Aerospace Engineering majors in the Engineering colleges
> is even worse than the drop-off rate in Engineering majors in general.
> <p>"I know, let's increase the number of H1-B visas. That will solve the
> problem and let us continue to pay the engineers poorly and trap them like
> crap. And if they complain we can just have them deported and get some
> some new ones."
> <br>
> <p>Marc, you are aiming your poisoned arrow at the wrong person.
> <br>
> <p>Regards,
> <p>Jed Margolin
> <p>===========================================================
> <br>"D.F.S." wrote:
> <blockquote TYPE=CITE>Jim Fisher <VarsityJim@aol.com> wrote:
> <p>> Uhh, this differs from what's already available in what way?
> <p>> What am I missing?
> <p>> Jim Fisher
> <br>> North Alabama
> <br>> Cherokee 180
> <p>I doesn't. I have downloaded free demos of the internet that do realtime
> <br>generation of 3D maps for free.
> <p>The problem is he convinced the patent office it does and got exclusive
> <br>rights to it.
> <p>The "Representation" of 3D clause would be EASILY be applied to any
> map display
> <br>system that provides terrain and obstruction info, INCLUDING approach
> plates
> <br>and plain old scanned images of sectionals.
> <p>We are (or were) poised on the leading edge of an explosion of incredible
> <br>capabilities and the huge safety advantage systems like this will or
> could
> <br>provide. Some guy getting a strangle hold on the "Right" to build such
> <br>systems and shutting everyone else down or extorting large sums of
> money from
> <br>anyone who make a success out of selling such systems will bring it
> all to
> <br>a screeching halt.
> <p>Stifling such innovation WILL kill people, MANY people, and destroy
> the lives
> <br>of friends and family.
> <p>I find that reprehensible.
> <p>And as he said himself:
> <br>"What makes you think I am not willing to defend the patent?"
> <p>Nothing, I fully expect you and your contingency fee lawers will go
> after
> <br>any and every deep pocket that will dare provide such a "Novel" system
> <br>as a cockpit moving map.
> <p>Marc
> <br>
> <br> </blockquote>
> </html>
View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: Mobile Weather for the PocketPC/Palm/WAP Version 3.0, Maury Cupitt
Next message: Re: Garmin 530 vs. UPSAT or others, Email address hidden
Next message in thread: Re: Preventing CFIT, Ron Natalie
Previous message in thread: Re: Preventing CFIT, James D. Ivey
|