|
|
[index]
[month]
[prev]
[next]
[thead-prev]
[thread-next]
Subject: Re: legal role of safety pilot
From: Ron Rosenfeld
Date: Thu Feb 08 03:30:49 2001
| |
|
On Wed, 07 Feb 2001 22:59:26 -0500, "Roy Smith, CFI" <roy@panix.com> wrote:
>Ron Rosenfeld <ronrosenfeld@spamcop.net> wrote:
>>> I'm not aware of any commodes which require more than a single
>>> person crew.
>> You really need to get out in the country, more.
>
>I'm certainly aware of the existance of 2-holers, 3-holers, etc. But,
>while these offer the option of multi-crew operation, to the best of my
>knowledge, none require it. Solo operations are still permitted.
Some of the two-holers, if operated solo, can take on a dangerous angle of
bank. (This is not a problem with the three-holers if operated from the
center position, however). While some would argue that the bank angle
might, by inducing vertigo, decrease evacuation time (especially in
emergencies), I have found that the disorientation tends to block the
exits.
Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA)
View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: Re: Capstone Software Problem- Attention Alaska Pilots, Ron Lee
Next message: Re: Just great, now I need to use Jepp, terpster
Next message in thread: Re: legal role of safety pilot, Ron Natalie
Previous message in thread: Re: legal role of safety pilot, Newps
|