|
|
[index]
[month]
[prev]
[next]
[thread-next]
Subject: Re: Flying direct without an IR GPS
From: Steven P. McNicoll
Date: Sun Feb 25 04:00:25 2001
| |
|
"Mike Rapoport" <rapopor1@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:3a9892e7_1@news.greatbasin.net...
>
> The problem with non-IFR approved GPS is not accuracy. The problem
> is that they don't have RAIM and can't tell you if the satellite geometry
> is bad.
>
Well, since ATC must provide radar monitoring and course guidance in
conjunction with an off-airways clearance, beyond normal usable navaid
altitude/distance limits, that doesn't seem to be much of a problem.
View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: Re: Airmap 100 or 300?, Ted Ede
Next message: Re: Flying direct without an IR GPS, Bob Noel
Next message in thread: Re: Flying direct without an IR GPS, Bob Noel
|