[index] [month] [prev] [next] [thead-prev]

JPH wrote:

> "Michael" <crewdog@flash.net> wrote in message
> news:r7Qn6.399$oU4.145066051@newssvr16.news.prodigy.com...
> > terpster <aterpster@hotmail.com> wrote
> > > > FORAY, which is also the FAF. A hold is charted for course
> > > > reversal. OK, makes sense to me.
> > > It doesn't make sense to me. Why does it exist since all procedure
> > > entries are NoPT routes?
> >
> > For someone who can navigate direct FORAY? It is an IAF,
> > and someone with RNAV who is coming in from the Northwest
> > can save time by going direct to that IAF, rather than one of
> > the others and backtracking.
> >
> > > This is an error. Directives in FAA Handbook 8260.19 require NoPT be on
> > > those arcs except where the procedure does not have a course reversal.
> >
> > That makes sense. Is this document available on line anywhere?
>
> Yes, the manual is on-line at the following address;
> http://terps.faa.gov/420di.htm
>

FAA Order 8260.19 paragraph 810a(1) requires, to place the "IAF" designation
behind every initial approach fix entry on 8260 forms in the "From" column.
Further, paragraph 810a(2) requires an "(NoPT)" entry in the "To" column after
that IAF when the PT is not required. Perfect example is found in 8260.19
Appendix 5, page 3.

>
> --
>
> John Haggerty
>
> Haggerty Family home page; http://home.flash.net/~texan/

View index by [date] [author] [subject]
Previous message: Re: Procedure turn?, JPH
Next message: Re: Minimum Equipment, King
Previous message in thread: Re: Procedure turn?, JPH